THE
MIDDY
SCANDAL
The most intriguing story of the week is the
rather mysterious: "Priest in hiding
after allegations from his past come to light".
Dr Eamonn Casey, 78, one time Bishop of Galway,
has gone into hiding.
Astonishingly, until this
he was chaplain of the Princess Royal Hospital.
Well, I can tell you for what he was infamous
for, and why he moved away from Ireland in
the first place...to Ecuador of all places!
Later, in 1998, he would move to the south
east of England.
Father Casey, a Catholic
priest, has a son! He had a lovechild with
his housekeeper, Annie Murphy. The Church
did what it usually does when confronted with
potential scandal; it tried to cover it up.
Annie Murphy went to live in the US and church
funds to the value of US $115,000 were sent
over to keep her quiet. And she did...for
twenty years. Then in 1992 she went public
and the bishop resigned.
What is curious is that
all this is in the public domain, although
to think we had such a famous person unbeknown
in our midst and now have lost him is a bit
of a disappointment. So, what are the "allegations"?
My God, he hasn't got more children, has he?!
BULLYING
What a laughable response to a very serious
issue we had. There is a national anti-bullying
campaign underway at the moment. At St Wilfred's
School, for example, pupils made a human chain
around the school and chanted "Say No
to Bullying". And what good was that
supposed to do? Obviously no more than the
selling of blue wristbands which Oathall did.
Oathall actually had a
bullying victim kill himself a year or two
ago. He had been bullied for years. The school
claimed that the group of boys who made his
life a misery had stopped doing so. Oh, yeah?
So why did he hang himself, then? I'm sure,
if his tormentors were still at school now,
they would be wearing wristbands or making
human chains; the school doing absolutely
nothing about the problem.
In Norway, schools can
be found negligent and their head teachers
jailed if they tolerate bullying. Now, I bet
that gets results.
MID SUSSEX MATTERS
COUNCILLORS
How nice of the district council to tell us
how much our councillors earn. Sorry, I meant
to say, "claim as expenses". I know
how upset our councillors get if you suggest
they benefit financially from serving on the
council.
Members Allowances are
listed for 2004/05. How forgetful of them
not to give us details of the latest figures
available, that of 2005/06, when they are
already published on the council website!
Their basic allowance has increased from £4,140
to £4,370. However, for some particular
members things look very rosy indeed. Take
leader, Christine Field, her payment for this
post has increased from £10,350 to £20,000.
Don't worry, she still gets her £4,370
and travel expenses, aswell. Cabinet members
payments have been rounded up to the nearest
five figure sum, from £7,245 to £10,000.
But why is none of this
printed in the council's latest issue of Mid
Sussex Matters? Could it be because the truth
is so shameful?
PARKING
As of 23 January the number of traffic wardens
employed by MSDC will increase from 4 to 13.
Councillor, Gordon Marples, says: "This
change will help us to reduce congestion,
improve safety and tackle the growing problem
of parking abuse, both 'on-street' and in
our car parks." Parking abuse in car
parks? Eh, what?
He also suggests that
they may introduce Controlled Parking Zones:
"residents would be able to purchase
permits to park in controlled zones."
Well, that's nice. So now you might have to
pay for the privilege of parking outside your
own home.
The reason we have a parking
problem is of the council's making. They had
the nerve to grant permission for housing
on a section of the Cyprus Road car park,
reducing capacity. They never think to make
more parking capacity. When new housing is
developed they don't think to make room for
cars. On new estates, that the developers
were able to get away with building only single
garages on luxury homes, is their fault. Then
they act surprised when people park in the
road.
What will traffic
wardens do? Make more revenue for the council,
of course.
|