SIDNEY
WEST
Two of our local papers
make this their lead item: the Middy and the
Leader. Hidden away in last week's copy of
the Middy was a planning application from
the council to redevelop the Sidney West recreation
ground.
Unfortunately the council
was rushed into a PR exercise when somebody
actually read it. Now we have the headlines
"A Huge Boost For Health And Sport"
and "It's Just What The Doctors Ordered",
which must have come straight out of MSDC's
spin department.
The council wishes to
relocate Park View surgery on the site. Ann
Duke of Petworth Drive writes to the Middy
telling us she has spoken to Councillor Gill
Balsdon (of getting Burgess Hill Football
Club fined for playing football fame) who
assured her that the surgery would take only
a small space near the entrance.
I believe in what she
said; just as I still believe in faeries.
Reading the small print, we see that the surgery
will be on two floors, taking 1800m²
of floor space and with "room for further
expansion."
So the council wants to
realize the value of its assets. How much
will the NHS pay them to keep them in the
lifestyle they feel that they so richly deserve?
That they say that erecting a new cricket
hut is "likely", is only to keep
within letter of the covenant Sidney West
bequeathed his land to the people of Burgess
Hill, if not its spirit. It was left for sporting
pursuits.
The council will, I'm
sure, come back with claims of a dire need
for a new surgery, yet there are three very
strong arguments against Sidney West's redevelopment.
The first: is that the council clearly intend
the eventual total redevelopment of one of
the few green patches of land close to the
centre of Burgess Hill. The second: is that
the residents, who live on an incline, will
now have people peering into their houses
from this two-storey building. Remember, the
council have just refused 3-year planning
permission for a tree house on privacy grounds.
And the third is: who in their right mind
would erect a busy surgery on Leylands Road,
one of the most congested roads in Burgess
Hill?
MIDDY
New
flats for Junction Road?
We read that neighbours are protesting over
the building of flats in Junction Road. They
argue that you should not build on such a
busy thoroughfare. Guess who supports them?
Yes, Burgess Hill Town Council.
It is Dennis Broom (hero
of this parish) writing in the letters, who
questions whether the council's argument that
this redevelopment smacks of "greed"
comes not from concern but envy. After all,
it is not they who will make the profit.
Visioning
John Samson in the Middy Mailbag recounts
that the experience of reading the "Better
Mid-Sussex" document left him in a hypnotic
trance! I can second that opinion. Mr Samson
points out that if we are supposed to be included
in MSDC's plans, why not some heavily advertised
public meetings? I concur, but wouldn't there
be a slight risk that the public would come
up with different opinions of what should
be done from what the councillors and developers
have decided, anyway?
LEADER
Community
Power!
We read that Hanbury Stadium in Haywards Heath
has been built for a local youth football
team by an enthusiastic group of volunteers.
One of these volunteers started a neighbourhood
watch on his estate five years ago and cleared
the area of drug dealers.
It just goes to
show how much you can achieve without the
handicap of local politicians.
|